Enric Corbera attacks those who dare to question bioneuroemotion

Cristian Reche for Digital Economy:

Corbera wants to eliminate the trail of more than 300 pages containing testimonies from those who were apparently his patients. The document, which has the support of associations such as the Spanish foundation against cancer (FEFOC), also reproduces statements made by him in some of his courses.

But, without a doubt, the most shocking document is the video of one of his former patients, Maribel Candelas. The Valencian, suffering from cancer, stated in an interview that she had stopped chemotherapy and had given herself over to bioneuroemotion. Candelas died a few months after leaving conventional medicine and Corbera removed the clip citing intellectual property rights.

Here you can read e.

He hides himself by saying that bioneuroemotion is not a therapy, but simply a “holistic method”:

Those around him, however, have always defended that “bioneuroemotion is neither a therapy nor a treatment, because its objective has never been to cure or alleviate a disease or symptomatology.” Likewise, they insist that they have never recommended stopping chemotherapy since Corbera’s is an “integrative and holistic method that works on emotions and that, applied to the field of health, is an addition to conventional treatments.”

But see with your own eyes the pseudoscientific savagery about osteoporosis and cancer that comes out of this man’s mouth:

https://youtu.be/xW48RCV4paU?t=7456

If you value articles like this, consider supporting us by becoming a Pro subscriber. Subscribers enjoy access to members-only articles, materials, and webinars.

Here is another one where he says that there are people who are cured just by watching his videos:

See also  Gambling addiction: characteristics and treatment -

Part of the blame lies with the psychologists and universities themselves who have legitimized this quackery by inviting them to their “scientific” psychology conferences.

How long are we going to continue giving way to charlatans within educational institutions? We have to stop with the rancid “everything adds up” thinking, especially when those “methods” are an aberration to scientific knowledge and development.

.