The origin of the universe is the mind –

In science the acceptance of new ideas follows well-defined steps: first,the reticent proclaim that the new approach violates the laws of sciencethis new idea is often persecuted or ridiculed; Second, the possible evidence presented is classified as weak or insufficient.; in Third, the proposed new idea is revealed to be real. and with more important repercussions than those imagined at first; and in the fourth and last stage, only a few remember that it was questioned.

The Dr Richard Conn Henry is a teacher of where he teaches physics and astronomy. He has been Deputy Director of the NASA Astrophysics Division and is Director of the Maryland Space Grant Consortium whose mission is, under the auspices of NASA, the development of research, education and public service projects in collaboration with universities and other academic institutions. .

Among his many articles we highlight “” published in 2005 in the journal Nature. The text begins by recalling the achievement of Galileo Galilei in ensuring that science could “believe the unbelievable”. He tells us that “the discovery of quantum mechanics in 1925 solved the problem of the nature of the universeand, in this way, once again science found itself faced with the challenge of believing the incredible. Nevertheless, “the most recent revolution in physics of the last 80 years has not similarly transformed the general knowledge of the public”.

Henry points out that “there have been several serious attempts to preserve a material world, but they have not produced a new physics and serve only to preserve an illusion”.

See also  The lies that build your reality -

That is, despite what is already known, it continues to be affirmed that the observer is one and things must be seen through its filter. And he makes a clear analogy with Andersen’s short story “” whose main message is question what everyone considers to be the incontestable truth.

In the same line of thought, Dr. James Hopwood Jeans, a British physicist, astronomer and mathematician who in 1930 said: “The flow of knowledge is directed towards a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than a great machine. The mind is no longer an accidental intruder into the realm of matter…rather we should welcome it as the creator and ruler of the world of matter”.

Dr. Henry reminds us that it has been many years since our true nature has been revealed to us. He assumes that “physicists avoid the truth because the truth is foreign to everyday physics” and insists that “the world is quantum-mechanical and we must learn to perceive it as such”. Also “One advantage of correcting humanity’s perception of the world is the joy that results from discovering the nature of the mind.” and by accepting that “there is nothing but observations” physics becomes very simple. encourages us to “make a galilean” and ends with this forceful affirmation: “the universe is immaterial, mental and spiritual. Live and enjoy”.

At Bioneuroemoción® we suggest that, based on this new paradigm, he influences his reality. We know that the unconscious cannot see another, it only sees itself.

See also  Bioneuroemotion: 5 reasons to know it

And in that “seeing each other” we can constantly decipher the information that resonates in our lives. Everything that surrounds us is information to know us. The , which is the main one of a session in Bioneuroemoción®, is a change of perception about a situation that is experienced as conflictive. And that change in perception generates another reality that is more suitable for the person.

If the observer did not exist, what sense would all the magnificence of our universe have? The universe exists because previously there is a Consciousness that wants to see, observe, its creation. Without Consciousness there is no consciousness: without an observer there is nothing for which it makes sense to exist. The mere observation manifests the observed, both are intrinsically linked.


“The study of the universe is a journey to self-discover ourselves.”

Carl Sagan.

If you liked it, share it